Geotrickster’s 10 Year Anniversary

Raven Steals the Sun by Preston Singletary

On the fourth of April it will officially be the 10 year anniversary of this blog. If it was another 10 years older backdated in time it would have been called part of the ‘Blogosphere’. Thankfully, that did not happen. I will be traveling on the fourth of this month, however. So instead I am going to upload this at a time when much of the world is in April Fool’s Day. It seems fitting. In that 10 years there have been 223 posts, well, now 224 I suppose. Not a bad clip.

My original purpose with this site was to serve the following purposes:

  1. Practice for policy idea writing.
  2. Working through issues I wasn’t sure about yet. A first testing ground so to speak.
  3. An online resume of sorts (see publications tag).
  4. To provide a repository for all the articles I either did not want to publish through someone else due to needing a custom tone or could not get published elsewhere (a formerly much more common arrangement).
  5. To be funny and casual about stuff treated with way too much seriousness elsewhere.

Once I began publishing externally much more frequently, the amount of analysis on foreign policy decreased massively, with domestic and philosophical posts growing, and even a few fiction pieces too. Aside from this though, the original 5 points seem to have largely stayed intact.

A lot has changed since Spring of 2015. Otherkin no longer rule the internet, replaced by a medley of domestic terror-coded ideological otherkin. A global pandemic ran rampant and unleashed the contradictions of late neoliberal breakdown. A carnival barker became President twice in a nonconsecutive manner, the first since Grover Cleveland to do so. In the interregnum between these terms a vegetative fossil held the presidency, but since much of the media liked him there was a coordinated conspiracy to pretend that this was not so. Greater multipolarity in world affairs, something that was basically inevitable from the Great Recession onwards, went from the primary world issue in the background to very much the forefront. The failure to establish a left populism, undone by postmodern moralism and puritanism and tied to the rotting corpse of a liberal establishment, led to the rise of a right populism which is far dumber than the left that should have been born from Occupy but wasn’t.

And then came signalgate to really ram home one consistent theme I have always hammered on this site: it is not primarily malicious competence that is responsible for so much of what you see, but a kind of autopilot incompetence. Notice too how a scandal that should be overwhelmingly directed against Mike Waltz in particular seems to be intentionally obscured by the very media that broke the story, likely because they find his uber-hawk establishment positioning the most palatable of anyone in the government and fear his replacement. Freedom of will? Human consciousness directing the species through rationality? These are the most overrated concepts in all of the humanities. We do not assign this special status to other species, and it makes our observations of their behavior far more objective.

So on the surface everything changed. But if you were paying attention nothing really unexpected happened at the macro scale. The empire was in decline when I started, it still is now. The planet is suffering under incredible loss of biodiversity and conditions of accelerating climate destabilization, same as it was then. Neoliberalism was a discredited force everywhere but finance and the media 10 years ago, and now its often even discredited there too. These things were always going to happen no matter what individuals or even specific countries were wielding the most power, though the rate of the change might differ between variables. Trump is an accelerant.

But just because real life is fatalistic doesn’t mean its predictable! Far from it. This site has the name it has because of my fascination with trickster figures in mythology. They remind us that the murky reality of moral ambiguity that we live in is random and fun in at least equal proportions to its more dire and tragic elements. To quote Dasha Nekrasova from before her podcast went fully unbearable: “Stay alive- something retarded might happen.” These are words to live by.

I would like to think that in these 10 years I have been consistent. Always willing to admit when I make a bad call (Russia won’t invade Ukraine outside of the Donbass/Crimea areas, Hillary will pull out a squeaker in 2016, Syria won’t fall to foreign states-*though in my defense I always carved out a Turkish exception to that one as a hedge, which sadly turned out to be correct). Want to dunk on me, those predictions are all still here. You can search for them. But I have had a greater number of correct calls too in the same time frame (A second Karabakh War with advantage this time for Azerbaijan, the always lingering dangers of the Israel Lobby on crafting viable foreign policy, US recognizing Moroccan rule over Western Sahara, the increased importance of Panama and the Arctic for geostrategy, other countries invoking their own form of R2P to justify war-no longer leaving this as an Atlantic only causus belli, and the missionary/military uses of social progressivism, to name just a few).

If there is one criticism anyone can rightly lob at me which I will proudly accept as true it is that I am a geographic determinist. I am. And if I am doing my job, other people will see why this apparently reductionist position is the pinnacle of material philosophical rigor and policy planning priorities. When accepting geographic determinism, people can virulently disagree on policy but still do so rationally and respectfully, knowing at least that all sides share a common physical reality. The animal is made by ecology.

So with a decade on here passed what are my favorite entries and which were the most popular?

Most popular is easy to prove as I have access to the data:

Oversocialization: An Alternative Social Media Theory, Geotrickster’s Official Rankings of DnD Editions, For Every Cheney Gained, a Million Voters Lost, seem to be the most consistent view getters, in some cases years later. I have even seen one of my lines from the most recent of these appear at random throughout the internet (the one about the party of FDR being replaced by a bunch of Patrick Batemans and the cast of The View).

Considering that there are hundreds I can choose from for my personal favorite I am just going to go with what hits the memory banks first as entries I am personally most proud of. These would be:

How to Write a Generic International Relations Article (from the first month no less and which apparently made my former doctoral advisor break out into laughter when he saw it during a meeting), Speculative Realism’s Mongolian Debut, Going Along With the Coyote Conquest, 17th Century Survival Tips for a Hysterical Age, Designing the Ideal International Relations Education, and Delving Down to Prospect (fiction!)

As for the future? I publish more often off this site than on it these days, but there will always be things that need a personal touch or that cannot be fiddled with by editors, things that fill the liminal spaces between clear cut genres and acceptable discourse, and books no one else wants to review. So long as that is the case, I will be here.

4 thoughts on “Geotrickster’s 10 Year Anniversary

  1. I’ve gotta claim the #1 fan spot✌️I’ve personally grown a lot more cynical since high school but also more confident so it balances out I guess.
    17th Century Survival Tips for a Hysterical Age is definitely your best work on the site imo. Still hoping to write a 10th as good someday. To 20 years and beyond!

    Liked by 1 person

    • You are truly the number 1 fan, having been there at least since year 2 when I was starting at the State Department and worried I would have to tone everything down because of that. Back then I had like 10 readers and now I have somewhere in the hundreds (still small fry I know). I had earlier fans than you but they are either inactive now or knew me personally before I made the site. It was obvious you had far more curiosity than an average person that age.

      One definitely changes the most in the decade post high school. Enough so that it becomes interesting to note what DOESNT change actually. I would sum up my own trip as going from philosophically progressive but politically conservative (in a libertarian sense) to being philosophically conservative, even reactionary, but politically socialist. Socialism actually deals with the cyclic and directionless nature of reality far better than capitalism so long as it avoids the euphoric metanarrative of stuff like the Soviet Union and modern wokery. There is a reason Asia is better at it than Europe.

      I am not a fan of the idea that age brings wisdom. There are way too many stupid old people out there. But it does bring perspective to those who paid attention and retained self critical capabilities. Getting older can help people see how stuff fits together more, which, for those who are not the propagandized anyway, leads to a view more based on balance and flow and proportionality rather than Platonic principles. Taoism for the wise, Plato for edgy youths and the foolish old. I definitely think about backlash more, especially to things I even support. There’s just more awareness of how everything can go wrong.

      One thing I think both you and I have learned a lot of in the past decade is that politics cannot bring happiness, even if it works for once. Personally I find this liberating and wasnt really looking for that anyway, but you might disagree. Its easier to study in a detached way with less personally invested in it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I suppose I’ve always been an “aborted reactionary socialist” of sorts ever since I first got mildly interested in politics watching my mom rant about Bush Jr. I say aborted since I’ve never been able commit enough to either reaction or socialism & so just decided to abandon the species & place my hope in artificial selection and long term planning. All my politics stems downstream from that (some folks have Math of their foundation, others geography, I have being a hater lol). It’s a shame I can’t be happy while learning what I need to in order to see Zeitgeist movement dreams come to fruition (what a disappoint they were), but I don’t have to be the one smiling in the end as long as the job gets done as I care infinitely more for efficiency than I do anyone’s feeling hence why I’ve always been called an authoritarian. I’ll be a positive pessimist as many times as it takes till I get my damn smart city!

        Liked by 1 person

      • The thing is, faith in long term planning is not pessimism but optimism.

        You are probably a better match for the Doomer Optimism people than I am, though I have many overlaps with them obviously. Personally I see the term (cribbed from Lovecraft) of ‘indifferentist’ to be the most accurate, especially as it reflects one who is a part of the human race but is skeptical of its attempts to impose values on literally everything.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment